We analyzed 71 owner comments across 4 YouTube reviews of the Garmin eTrex 22x. The case for a dedicated handheld GPS in 2026 is not accuracy — modern phones are accurate. It is power and consequences. The eTrex 22x runs about 25 hours on two AA batteries, which you can replace in the field, in the cold, indefinitely, from any petrol station. A phone gives you one battery and then it is a brick, and it is also the thing you need to call for help. Grant's verdict: Bought for the batteries, kept for the batteries. The interface is dated and owners say so — but two AAs you can buy anywhere is a failure mode a phone cannot match.
Who it's for
Buy this if: you go somewhere where being lost has real consequences, you want navigation that does not compete with your phone's battery, or you are out for multiple days beyond reliable charging.
Skip this if: you hike marked, popular trails within phone signal — a phone with offline maps and a power bank does the same job better and you already own it. Interface and software was the top complaint theme in the owner comments we read.
In the field
The AA battery is the whole argument
Everything good about this unit follows from its power source. Two AA batteries, a published runtime of roughly 25 hours, and the ability to carry spares that weigh almost nothing and never self-discharge in a meaningful way. On a four-day trip you can carry a week of navigation in a jacket pocket.
Compare the failure modes rather than the features. A phone running GPS with the screen waking constantly is a heavy power draw, and cold weather makes lithium batteries behave far worse than their rating suggests. When the phone dies you lose navigation and your emergency call in the same moment. That single-point-of-failure problem is the actual reason to carry a separate unit.
One nuance worth knowing: the 25-hour figure assumes alkaline AAs. NiMH rechargeables and lithium AAs behave differently, and lithium AAs in particular hold up much better in the cold. Set the battery type in the settings menu or the gauge will mislead you.
The interface is the complaint, and it is fair
Across the owner comments we read, app and software was the most frequent complaint theme (5 mentions), ahead of battery and power (4) and price (3). This is a button-driven menu system designed a long time ago, and coming from a phone it feels slow and unintuitive.
The counter-argument owners themselves make is that the learning curve is front-loaded. One of the more upvoted comments in the set we read described using an eTrex for years, gradually discovering its capability, and planning to upgrade within the same line — which is a fair description of how these units reward familiarity.
Buttons also do something a touchscreen cannot: they work with gloves on, in driving rain, and when your hands are too cold to be precise. That is not nostalgia, it is the correct interface for the conditions this device exists for.
Does it replace your phone? No — and that is the point
The right framing is redundancy, not replacement. Your phone is the better map: bigger, brighter, faster, with better software. The eTrex is the map that still works when the better one is dead, wet, or broken.
That also tells you who should not buy it. If you walk waymarked trails inside phone coverage and within a day of the car, a phone with offline maps and a small power bank is a better and cheaper answer, and you already own most of it.
The moment the calculation flips is when self-rescue becomes your responsibility — multi-day trips, poor coverage, winter, or off-trail navigation. Note that this unit navigates; it does not send messages. If you need to call for help from outside coverage, that is a satellite messenger, which is a different device and a different purchase.
Check the current price
Amazon See price →Links are Amazon affiliate links — we earn a commission if you buy, at no extra cost to you. It never changes our score.